Introduction: Understanding the Foundations of Legal Systems and Types of Law
The study of law extends far beyond memorizing statutes and case precedents. To truly grasp the essence of legal systems, one must engage with jurisprudence—the philosophy of law. This field interrogates the very nature of law itself: Where does it come from? What gives it authority? How does it relate to morality and justice? Among the most enduring frameworks for answering these questions is the classification of law into four distinct but interrelated types: Eternal Law, Divine Law, Natural Law, and Human (Positive) Law.
This taxonomy, most famously systematized by the medieval philosopher and theologian St. Thomas Aquinas in his monumental work, Summa Theologica, provides a hierarchical model for understanding the sources and legitimacy of legal authority. For centuries, this framework has shaped Western legal thought, influencing everything from international human rights charters to the constitutional foundations of modern states.
In this detailed exploration, we will delve into each type of law, examining its definitions, characteristics, historical proponents, and practical examples. We will also analyze the critical relationships between them and their profound relevance in contemporary legal debates, from bioethics to the prosecution of war crimes. This guide is designed for law students, legal enthusiasts, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of why we live by rules and what makes a law truly just.
Table of Contents
1. Eternal Law: The Cosmic Blueprint
2. Divine Law: Revelation and Guidance
3. Natural Law: Reason and Human Nature
4. Human (Positive) Law: Man-Made Rules
5. The Hierarchical Relationship Between the Laws
6. Case Studies and Modern Applications
7. Critiques and Counterarguments
8. Conclusion: The Enduring Dialogue
Read: Ultimate Guide to Introduction to Legal Method
1. Eternal Law: The Cosmic Blueprint
1.1 Definition and Conceptual Overview
Eternal Law represents the most foundational and abstract category of law. It is defined as the unchanging, universal rational plan conceived by a divine intellect (God) that governs the entire cosmos. This is not law in the statutory sense but the ultimate metaphysical order—the divine blueprint for the universe that dictates the movement of stars, the laws of physics, and the moral order inherent in creation. It is the source from which all other laws derive their legitimacy and coherence.
As articulated by St. Thomas Aquinas, Eternal Law is the “divine reason” existing in the mind of God, which directs all actions and movements toward their proper end. For Aquinas, a preeminent figure in natural law theory whose work is essential reading on legal philosophy, this concept is the bedrock of his entire legal philosophy.
1.2 Key Characteristics of Eternal Law
· Source: Derives solely from the divine wisdom or reason of God, the supreme lawgiver.
· Scope: Universal, immutable, and all-encompassing. It applies to all creation—rational beings (humans), irrational animals, and inanimate objects. The orbit of planets and the instinct of animals both follow Eternal Law.
· Immutability: It is unchangeable and timeless, existing outside the constraints of human history and influence.
· Purpose: To provide the foundational order for the universe, ensuring harmony and directing all things toward their ultimate good according to divine will.
1.3 Examples and Manifestations
· Physical Laws: The law of gravity, the laws of thermodynamics, and the biological processes of growth and decay are all physical manifestations of Eternal Law. They operate consistently according to a rational order.
· Moral Laws: The fundamental principle that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided” is an eternal moral truth that transcends human legislation.
· Metaphysical Order: The inherent purpose (telos) of things, such as an acorn’s purpose to become an oak tree, reflects the teleological order embedded in creation by Eternal Law.
1.4 Proponents and Philosophical Context
St. Thomas Aquinas is the foremost proponent of this concept, building upon the ideas of Aristotle and St. Augustine of Hippo.
· Aristotle spoke of a universal natural order but did not explicitly frame it as a divine law.
· St. Augustine referred to the “eternal law” as the reason and will of God that commands the natural order to be maintained.
· Aquinas synthesized these ideas, placing Eternal Law at the apex of his legal hierarchy. He argued that while humans cannot perceive Eternal Law in its entirety, they can participate in it through reason (Natural Law) and receive it through revelation (Divine Law).
For further reading on Aquinas’s work, you can access the text on The Aquinas Institute website, a authoritative source for Thomistic philosophy.
2. Divine Law: Revelation and Guidance
2.1 Definition and Conceptual Overview
Divine Law is the law explicitly revealed by God to humanity through sacred texts, prophets, or religious teachings. Unlike the abstract Eternal Law, Divine Law is directly communicated and is intended to guide human behavior toward salvation, moral perfection, and a right relationship with the divine. It addresses not only outward actions but also inner intentions and spiritual duties.
2.2 Key Characteristics of Divine Law
· Source: Direct communication from God through divine revelation. This is typically codified in sacred scriptures.
· Scope: Governs the spiritual life and moral conduct of believers. It often deals with matters of faith, worship, and ultimate purpose that are beyond the complete grasp of unaided human reason.
· Purpose: To lead humanity toward its ultimate supernatural end (e.g., salvation or union with God) and to provide clear, unequivocal moral guidance that supplements the general principles of Natural Law.
2.3 Examples of Divine Law
· The Ten Commandments (Judaism and Christianity): Found in the Book of Exodus, these commandments provide explicit moral and religious injunctions, such as prohibitions against murder, theft, and adultery.
· Sharia (Islam): Derived primarily from the Qur’an and the Sunnah (traditions) of the Prophet Muhammad, Sharia is a comprehensive divine law governing all aspects of life, from prayer and fasting to business transactions and family law. A comprehensive resource on Islamic law can be found at the Program in Islamic Law at Harvard Law School.
· Canon Law (Catholic Church): The system of laws and legal principles made and enforced by the hierarchical authorities of the Church to govern its external order and discipline.
2.4 The Role of Divine Law in Aquinas’s Framework
For Aquinas, Divine Law is necessary for two main reasons:
1. The Fallibility of Human Reason: Human reason is clouded by sin and error. While Natural Law is accessible to all, we can misapply its general principles. Divine Law provides certainty on specific moral issues (e.g., “Thou shalt not kill”).
2. The Supernatural End of Humanity: Human beings are ordained to an eternal, supernatural end (beatitude) that surpasses the natural capacities of reason. Divine Law guides us toward this end, governing inner thoughts and motives that Human Law cannot reach.
2.5 Divine Law vs. Religious Extremism
It is crucial to distinguish the concept of Divine Law from its potential for misinterpretation. In a pluralistic society, the relationship between Divine Law and state-enforced Human Law is a complex subject of debate in comparative law and legal philosophy. Most modern democratic states separate religious doctrine from civil legislation, though Divine Law remains a primary source of personal morality for billions.
3. Natural Law: Reason and Human Nature
3.1 Definition and Conceptual Overview
Natural Law is the most influential concept bridging the gap between the divine and the human. It is the moral and rational order inherent in human nature, which is discoverable through reason and reflection. It is not a written code but a set of universal moral principles that guide humans toward their natural end—to live a good, virtuous, and flourishing life. The core axiom of Natural Law, as stated by Aquinas, is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” All other precepts are derived from this first principle.
3.2 Key Characteristics of Natural Law
· Source: Derived from human reason and the observable natural order, which itself is a reflection of Eternal Law.
· Scope: Universal and immutable in its basic principles. It applies to all human beings by virtue of their shared rational nature.
· Purpose: To enable humans to live in accordance with their rational nature, thereby promoting justice, virtue, and the common good.
3.3 The Content of Natural Law: Basic Goods
Modern natural law theorists, like John Finnis, identify basic goods that are self-evident to practical reason and form the foundation of all human action:
1. Life: The good of self-preservation.
2. Knowledge: The desire to know the truth.
3. Sociability (Friendship): Living in harmony with others.
4. Procreation: The bearing and raising of children.
5. Practical Reasonableness: The ability to use one’s intelligence to choose actions wisely.
6. Religion: Questions about the origins of the cosmos.
7. Play: Enjoyment and recreation.
According to this view, a law that arbitrarily undermines one of these basic goods (e.g., a law authorizing genocide) is inherently unjust and lacks moral authority.
3.4 Historical Proponents and Evolution
· Aristotle: His teleological view of nature—that everything has a purpose—laid the groundwork for Natural Law theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy provides an excellent overview of his ethical theories.
· Cicero: The Roman statesman argued that “true law is right reason in agreement with nature,” a universal law that is unchanging and eternal.
· St. Thomas Aquinas: Systematized the theory, stating that Natural Law is humanity’s “participation” in the Eternal Law through reason.
· John Locke: Used Natural Law as the foundation for inalienable rights to “life, liberty, and property,” which profoundly influenced modern human rights doctrines and the American Declaration of Independence. The original text can be found on the National Archives website.
· Martin Luther King Jr.: In his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” King appealed to Natural Law to justify civil disobedience against unjust positive laws (Jim Crow segregation), calling them “no law at all.”
3.5 Natural Law in Adjudication: Case Studies
Natural Law is not merely theoretical; it has practical legal consequences.
· The Nuremberg Trials (1945-1946): Nazi war criminals were prosecuted for “crimes against peace,” “war crimes,” and “crimes against humanity.” Their defense—that they were following the positive laws of the Nazi state—was rejected. The tribunals appealed to a “higher law” that transcends national legislation, a clear application of Natural Law principles.
· Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) U.S.: While a constitutional law case, Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion appealed to evolving notions of liberty and personhood, arguments with strong philosophical roots in natural law thinking about fundamental human dignity and the right to form family relationships.
4. Human Law (Positive Law): Man-Made Rules
4.1 Definition and Conceptual Overview
Human Law, also known as Positive Law, is the body of rules created by human authorities—such as legislatures, judges, or rulers—to regulate the behavior of individuals within a specific society. Its validity is derived not from its moral content but from its source (a recognized authority) and its enactment through proper procedures. The central tenet of legal positivism, the school of thought most associated with Positive Law, is that there is no necessary connection between law and morality.
4.2 Key Characteristics of Positive Law
· Source: Enacted by human institutions (e.g., the National Assembly, Congress, or a sovereign).
· Scope: Limited to a specific jurisdiction (e.g., a country or state) and is subject to change, amendment, or repeal.
· Purpose: To translate the broad principles of Natural Law into specific, practical, and enforceable rules that maintain public order, resolve disputes, and promote the common good within a particular social context.
4.3 Examples of Positive Law
· The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria: The supreme positive law of the land.
· The Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020: A statute governing business organizations.
· The Penal Code and Criminal Code: Laws defining crimes and their punishments.
· Judicial Precedents (Case Law): Rules established by judicial decisions.
The official laws of Nigeria can be accessed on LawPavilion, a leading legal database in Nigeria.
4.4 Proponents of Legal Positivism
· Thomas Hobbes: Argued that in a state of nature, life would be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,” necessitating a sovereign with absolute power to create and enforce laws for order.
· John Austin: Defined law as the “command of the sovereign” backed by a threat of sanction. For Austin, a law’s validity depends solely on its source, not its goodness or justice.
· H.L.A. Hart: The most influential 20th-century positivist. In The Concept of Law, he moved beyond Austin’s “command theory,” arguing that law is a system of social rules. He distinguished between:
· Primary Rules: Rules of conduct that impose duties (e.g., “do not steal”).
· Secondary Rules: Rules about rules. The most important is the “rule of recognition,” a social practice that provides the ultimate criteria for legal validity in a given system (e.g., “whatever the Queen in Parliament enacts is law” in the UK). A summary of his ideas can be found on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
4.5 The Positivist vs. Natural Law Debate
This is the central debate in jurisprudence. The question is simple yet profound: Can a law that is grossly immoral (e.g., apartheid laws, Nazi decrees) still be considered a valid law?
· Legal Positivists (e.g., Hart): Say yes. They argue that validity and morality are separate questions. A law can be valid but horribly unjust. Calling it “law” doesn’t make it moral; it just allows us to clearly identify it as the law of the land so we can then make a conscious moral choice to oppose it.
· Natural Lawyers (e.g., Lon Fuller): Say no. Fuller argued that law has an “internal morality.” A system of rules that completely fails to be general, public, prospective, clear, and consistent (what he called the “procedural morality of law”) is not simply a bad legal system but fails to be a legal system at all. Extreme injustice, for Natural Lawyers, is not law (lex injusta non est lex).
5. The Hierarchical Relationship Between the Laws
In the classical Thomistic framework, these four types of law are not independent; they exist in a dynamic and hierarchical relationship, with Eternal Law as the supreme source.
Figure 1: The Hierarchical Relationship of Laws according to Natural Law Theory
This flowchart illustrates the classical Thomistic view:
· Eternal Law is the ultimate source.
· Divine Law and Natural Law are two channels through which humans access the Eternal Law.
· Human Law is legitimate only when it derives from and remains congruent with the higher laws. A human law that fundamentally violates Natural Law (e.g., a law mandating genocide) is considered “unjust” and may lack moral obligating force, even if it is formally valid within a positivist system.
This hierarchy provides a powerful tool for critiquing existing legal systems and advocating for legal change based on objective moral standards.
6. Case Studies and Modern Applications
The debate between these types of law is not an academic relic. It is alive in courtrooms and legislatures today.
· Human Rights Law: The entire modern human rights movement, enshrined in documents like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), is predicated on Natural Law ideas. It asserts that all humans possess inherent, inalienable dignity and rights simply by virtue of being human, regardless of whether their government’s positive law recognizes them.
· Bioethics: Debates on issues like euthanasia, abortion, and genetic engineering are often framed in Natural Law terms (e.g., the sanctity of life) versus positivist or utilitarian perspectives (e.g., individual autonomy and legal permissibility).
· International Law: The concept of “jus cogens” (peremptory norms), which are fundamental principles of international law from which no derogation is permitted (e.g., prohibitions against genocide, slavery, torture), reflects the idea of a higher law that binds all states.
7. Critiques and Counterarguments
No legal theory is without its critics.
· Legal Positivism’s Challenge: Positivists like H.L.A. Hart argue that Natural Law is ambiguous and dangerous. Its ambiguity lies in the difficulty of achieving consensus on what “nature” or “reason” dictates. Its danger lies in potentially allowing judges to strike down democratically enacted laws based on their own subjective moral views.
· Moral Relativism: This viewpoint argues that moral values are not universal but are culturally and historically contingent. What one culture’s “reason” deems natural (e.g., natural rights) might be absent or different in another.
· The “Naturalistic Fallacy”: Philosopher David Hume pointed out the logical problem of deriving an “ought” (a moral obligation) from an “is” (a statement of fact about the natural world). Just because something occurs in nature does not mean it is morally good.
8. Conclusion: The Enduring Dialogue
The typology of Eternal, Divine, Natural, and Human law provides a profound and multi-layered framework for understanding the complex nature of legal authority. It forces us to confront essential questions about justice, morality, and the role of the state.
While the strict Thomistic hierarchy may not be accepted in its entirety by all modern legal systems, the tension it identifies—between law as it is (lex lata) and law as it ought to be (de lege ferenda)—remains the central, enduring drama of jurisprudence. Whether in the defense of human rights, the resistance against tyranny, or the everyday interpretation of statutes, the dialogue between positive law and a higher moral standard continues to shape our world.
For a comparative analysis of these concepts, visit the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s entry on Natural Law Theories.
This comprehensive note was curated by LawPedia to aid your legal studies kindly consult your textbooks and note to read according to your lecturer’s course point of view.
For more free resources, course materials, and a community of aspiring lawyers, visit our website at www.lawpedia.com.ng.